bg
A bank, notary or professional property intermediary may request information and evidence about the money used to buy a Bulgarian property. The review is not reduced to one declaration, and no universal document list guarantees acceptance. The strongest preparation is a traceable story showing where the money came from and how it reaches the seller.
Bulgaria's AML Act includes banks, notaries and professional real-estate intermediaries among obliged entities. ZMIP, Article 4, Bulgarian text It defines source of funds as the source of money used in the particular transaction and distinguishes it from the person's overall source of wealth. ZMIP, Supplementary Provisions §1(28)-(29)
Sources were checked on 21 August 2026. Requirements are risk-based, and each obliged entity decides what is sufficient under its lawful procedures.
Why one transaction may attract more questions
Not every purchase is reviewed to the same depth. The amount and payment structure, countries and accounts, third parties, unusual flows and consistency with the known client profile may matter. That does not automatically imply suspicion. It means the entity must understand the operation.
Article 66 provides for clarification through at least two listed methods, including client information, independent official sources, information lawfully collected and tracing financial flows. ZMIP, Article 66
The declaration is not always the first document
A written declaration has a statutory role, but it is not a magic form. Generally, it is used where the source cannot be clarified or evidence conflicts after other methods; for an occasional operation it may be used where two methods cannot be applied. ZMIP, Article 66(2) AML Rules, Annex 4
A signature cannot repair an inconsistent account. If you declare savings while payment arrives from another person or country, further explanation is likely.
What evidence may help
The exact set is individual. Examples include statements showing accumulation and transfer, a contract for sale of another asset, gift or loan agreements with the matching transfer, succession records, dividends and employment or business-income evidence. These are examples, not a guaranteed checklist.
Arrange documents chronologically. For a parental gift, show both the basis and path of money. For company-derived funds, separate company and personal money and confirm the corporate and tax basis for distribution.
Cross-border transfers, cryptoasset proceeds, old cash holdings and layered loans merit early legal, accounting or AML advice. Do not reroute payments to avoid questions. That adds risk rather than solving it.
Reduce avoidable delay
Ask the bank, notary and intermediary about procedure before completion day. Give a consistent and truthful explanation. Preserve contracts and the banking trail, and do not mix family, company and personal payments without a clear basis.
Keep this review separate from a tax audit and from the family-law question of whether funds are personal or marital. Similar documents may matter, but the legal questions differ.
Verified primary sources
Where a representative is involved, separately define who may direct payment in the power-of-attorney documents.
Frequently asked questions
No. It may show balance and movement without explaining the original source.
Do not rely on such a rule. Review is driven by law, risk and the actual transaction.
No. It is one statutory tool and cannot remove inconsistencies or the need for more information.
Vladimir Kolev is the CEO of TV Property and an entrepreneur in the field of residential and investment properties. He graduated in Economics and Mathematics from the University of Bath and Sofia University and has practical experience in the development of distinguished residential projects in Sofia and along the Black Sea coast.